Home
|
Login
|
Contact Us
|
Search:
Key Issues
Public Policy
News & Events
Financial Center
Resources & Stats
Careers & Education
How It Works
About NEI
News & Events
>
Speeches
>
2003 Speeches
>
September 19, 2003
Email to a friend
News & Events:
Conferences and Meetings
NEI Backgrounders: Fact Sheets and Policy Briefs
News Releases
Nuclear Energy Insight
Perspectives on Public Opinion
Speeches
News & Events
September 19, 2003
Scott Peterson
Vice President, Communications
Nuclear Energy Institute
"Nuclear Energy As An Environmental Answer"
GENES4/ANP2003 Conference
Kyoto, Japan
September 19, 2003
Good morning. It is a great pleasure to be back here in Kyoto for three reasons. First, because it is a delightful city. Second, because I have the opportunity to discuss an important topic with a distinguished and knowledgeable audience. Third – and certainly most significant to the topic of my presentation – because Kyoto is where the international nuclear industry first came together proactively to make the case for nuclear energy as a vital element of future environmental quality worldwide.
My topic today is the environment, and more specifically the contribution advanced nuclear reactors may make to the environment. In one sense – reactor for reactor — advanced reactors can’t make any greater contribution than today’s operating reactors because today’s reactors because they do not emit greenhouse gases during production of electricity.
But in another sense, advanced reactor technologies promise to be even safer and more efficient than today’s reactors. These qualities – coupled with clean air benefits — should raise public approval for nuclear energy even higher than it is today. Public approval has played a significant role in the current renaissance of nuclear energy, and increases the likelihood of more nuclear plants being built.
And the expansion of nuclear energy will, over the next few decades, benefit the world’s environmental future.
Some of the brightest and best-informed scientists in the U.S. agree. A recent study by Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded that “…the nuclear option should be retained, precisely because it is an important carbon-free source of power that can potentially make a significant contribution to future electricity supply.”
+ MORE
E-mail link to a friend
Send to friend
Email Addresses separated by comma:
Please enter e-mail address.
Your message (click here):
Please enter some message text.
<br/>You might be interested in this item I found on the NEI website:<br/>