Introduction
Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and members of the Subcommittee. It is a pleasure to appear before you as you consider “New Nuclear Power Generation in the United States.” Because, as you are aware, the role of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as prescribed by the Congress is regulatory  and not promotional, my discussion will focus first on actions the Commission has taken and is taking to ensure the continued safe application of nuclear technology; to strengthen regulatory predictability; and to facilitate public access to our information and participation in our process. We believe that the achievement of all three of those goals will enable others to determine how to use the nuclear energy option.  

License Renewal
The focus of the Commission’s review of license renewal applications is on maintaining plant safety, with the primary concern directed at the effects of aging on important systems, structures, and components.  The review of a renewal application proceeds along two paths — one for the review of safety issues and the other to assess potential environmental impacts.  Applicants must demonstrate that they have identified and can manage the effects of aging and can continue to maintain an acceptable level of safety during the period of extended operation. The applicant must also address the impacts on the environment from extended operation.

With the improved economic conditions for operating nuclear power plants, the Commission has seen sustained strong interest in license renewal which allows plants to operate up to 20 years beyond their original 40-year operating license. The original 40-year term was established in the Atomic Energy Act and was based on financial and antitrust considerations, not technical limitations.