Newsroom Archive
On a family visit with my 12-year-old niece to Philadelphia recently, my niece, Helen, solved climate change. She suggested that we, on Earth, find a planet in our galaxy with a species that breathes in carbon dioxide and exhales oxygen and that we trade with them. Brilliant idea, but until we find that planet with “Carbon Breathers,” Pennsylvania state legislators have mapped out a smart plan to keep the state’s nuclear plants (which avoid 37 million tons of carbon dioxide every year, the equivalent of 8 million cars) up and running.
Energy storage technologies—and batteries in particular—are often seen as the “holy grail” to fully decarbonizing our future electricity grid, along with renewables and nuclear energy—which provides more than 56 percent of America’s carbon-free electricity.
This week, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee discussed a bipartisan bill designed to help America recapture its lead in nuclear energy technology in the face of increasing global competition. At a packed hearing on Capitol Hill, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) praised the Nuclear Energy Leadership Act.
NASA’s impressive landing of the Insight probe on Mars this week has drawn new attention to the next step: manned missions to the planet. While there are many challenges in sending humans to the Red Planet and getting them home, one of the biggest is something that nuclear technology can help with: generating electricity, heat, water and rocket fuel.
Jason Grumet, founder and president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, joins Monica Trauzzi for the sixth episode of “Off the Menu.”
Korsnick participated in a Washington Post Energy 202 Live panel discussion on the future of energy across several sectors.
Start out with a really new idea, and it can lead you to a lot of good places. The engineers at NuScale Power talked about those places one day recently when they held an open house at the company headquarters in Corvallis, Oregon, to talk to energy experts about their progress toward deploying a small modular reactor (SMR).
The Boston Globe highlighted a recent report by the Union of Concerned Scientists stressing nuclear energy’s role in reducing carbon emissions.
Anyone who has worked in the nuclear industry knows how prevalent and influential Navy veterans are in the community. The journey from the Nuclear Navy to the nuclear industry is one of the most common military-to-civilian talent pipelines. This seemingly natural transition into the civilian nuclear industry is in part because the technical training transfers directly over to a commercial nuclear plant. An even more important factor is that the nuclear Navy offers a real-world, big-picture experience that is very difficult to replicate in a university.
On Tuesday, voters in 46 states headed to the polls to fill over 6,000 legislative seats, choose 36 new governors and consider more than 160 ballot measures. Although nuclear energy was not explicitly on the ballot, several state initiatives considered energy issues with an impact on the technology. NEI Director of State Governmental Affairs and Advocacy Christine Csizmadia, an expert on state legislative affairs, shared her analysis of the midterm elections, and the consequence for energy policy and its impact on statehouses across the country.
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released a report today acknowledging the impact that nuclear plant closures have on climate and air quality. The report advocates for policies such as those adopted in states like Illinois, New York, Connecticut and New Jersey in recent years to preserve well run, financially challenged nuclear plants. The report explicitly recognizes the need for nuclear power to play a substantial role in decarbonization efforts.
A new Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) study shows that the nuclear industry has reduced its total generating costs by 19 percent since their peak in 2012. These reductions in cost are so dramatic that 2017 total generating costs of $33.50 per Megawatt hour (MWh) have gone down to almost what they were nearly ten years ago in 2008 ($32.75 per MWh).